Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Milsap v. Clay County et al
as 4:2024cv04120
Petitioner:
Ricardo Ramone Milsap
Respondent:
Clay County and Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Milsap v. Clay County et al
as 3:2024cv03017
Petitioner:
Ricardo Ramone Milsap
Respondent:
Clay County and Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Townsend v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00447
Petitioner:
Ricardo Townsend
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bolden v. Iowa, State of et al
as 1:2022cv00010
Petitioner:
Darrell Ricardo Bolden
Respondent:
Iowa, State of, Linn County Sheriff and Iowa Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tyler et al v. Ramey
as 4:2020cv00787
Respondent:
Eileen Ramey
Petitioner:
Melvin Leroy Tyler and Ricardo Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morales et al v. Ramey
as 4:2019cv01791
Respondent:
Eileen Ramey
Petitioner:
Melvin Leroy Tyler and Ricardo Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bolden v. McKinney et al
as 1:2019cv00032
Respondent:
Department of Corrections, Iowa, State of and James McKinney
Petitioner:
Darrell Ricardo Bolden and Darrel Bolden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gallardo v. Rios
as 0:2018cv00293
Petitioner:
Ricardo Gallardo
Respondent:
Rios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Githua v. Kelly et al
as 4:2017cv00084
Petitioner:
Paul Kabiru Githua
Respondent:
John F Kelly , Loretta E Lynch and Ricardo Wong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bwana v. Lynch et al
as 4:2017cv00010
Respondent:
Loretta E Lynch, Jeh Charles Johnson, Mark Owen and others
Petitioner:
Malack Bwire Bwana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
