Cases 21 - 30 of 68
Beal v. Harry et al
as 4:2021cv00629
Defendant:
Steve Brock, Adrian Barnes, Tonya Harry and others
Plaintiff:
Camarion Beal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hemphill v. St. Louis City Jails et al
as 4:2021cv00288
Plaintiff:
Davon Hemphill
Defendant:
George Hayes, Lt. Unknown Wilborn, Lyda Krewson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burke et al v. St. Louis City Jails et al
as 4:2021cv00257
Plaintiff:
Davon Hemphill and Calvin Burke
Defendant:
Jeffrey E. Carson, Lyda Krewson, Lt. Unknown Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Ulman et al
as 4:2021cv00191
Defendant:
Jimmie Edwards, Julie Johnson, Marissa Ulman and others
Plaintiff:
Adrian Darcy Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hemingway v. Glass et al
as 4:2020cv01537
Plaintiff:
Terry Glenn Hemingway, Jr.
Defendant:
Dale Glass, Adrian Barnes, Cortez Hagler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garner v. Corizon Medical Dept. et al
as 4:2020cv01104
Defendant:
Unknown CJC Superintendent, Corizon Medical Dept., Adrian Barnes and others
Plaintiff:
Oscar Garner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winston v. Edwards et al
as 4:2020cv00566
Defendant:
V. Sullivan-Price, Jimmie Edwards, Adriane Barnes and others
Plaintiff:
De'Angelo Don'Virgil Winston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Ulman et al
as 4:2019cv03319
Defendant:
Jimmie Edwards, Julie Johnson, Marissa Ulman and others
Plaintiff:
Adrian Darcy Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weems v. Officer John Doe et al
as 4:2019cv00208
Defendant:
Officer John Doe and City of Muscatine
Interested Party:
Muscatine County Attorney's Office
Plaintiff:
Adrian Lamar Weems
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hiley v. Parker et al
as 5:2019cv00206
Plaintiff:
Adrian Lamar Hiley
Defendant:
Parker, Stephanie Harris, Arkansas Department of Community Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
