Cases 131 - 140 of 13,622
Maget v. Richard et al
as 4:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Abbagayle Marie Maget and Kevin Lee Maget
Defendant:
Richard, Brush-Strode, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chenault v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
James C Chenault
Defendant:
S Williams and Pritcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. Roberts et al
as 1:2024cv01027
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Andrews, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Ricky Roberts, Gayla Telano, Dr. Deana Hopson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosso v. Sears et al
as 5:2024cv05096
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph Rosso
Defendant:
Sergeant Sarah Sears, Corporal Joel Minor, Corporal Dakota Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Gibson
as 4:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Wood
Defendant:
James Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Randle et al
as 4:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Ellis
Defendant:
Kenyon Randle and Does Lieutenant, E.A.R.U. Max; Mental Health Doctor, Central Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephens v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Brian Stephens
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Arkansas Division of Correction et al
as 4:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Allen
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Correction, WellPath, Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Finley v. McCormick et al
as 6:2024cv06057
Plaintiff:
Jaime Glenn Finley and Possum
Defendant:
Sheriff Mike McCormick, Joel Ware, Chief S. Elrod and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Finley v. Smith # 168 et al
as 6:2024cv06058
Plaintiff:
Jaime Glenn Finley and Possum
Defendant:
W. Smith # 168 and B. Rosburg # 366
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
