Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Moore v. Corizon Medical Services, Inc. et al
as 6:2021cv03095
Plaintiff:
Othel Moore
Defendant:
Wixom, Douglas Arthur, Shawn Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller-Bey v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2021cv00272
Defendant:
Van Loo, Brock Van Loo, MD John Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Hilary B Miller-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller-Bey v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv04027
Defendant:
Van Loo, Brock Van Loo, Jane Wheeler and others
Plaintiff:
Hilary B Miller-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster v. Corizon Medical Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv06122
Defendant:
Ronda J. Pash, Corizon Medical Services, Inc. and Mr. Whitmore
Plaintiff:
William Wintworth Foster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Nunley et al
as 1:2016cv00007
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ryan Murphy
Defendant:
Nunley, Cassy Richardson, Opel Bledso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickens v. Corizon Medical Services Inc et al
as 5:2015cv00107
Plaintiff:
Michael Glenn Pickens
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services Inc, Amanda Jane King, Latasha Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coffey v. Hobbs et al
as 3:2014cv00292
Plaintiff:
Kenny Coffey
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Larry Norris, Grant Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Corizon Medical Services Inc
as 5:2014cv00404
Plaintiff:
Nathan Hughes
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services Inc, Burl, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palmer v. Murphy et al
as 6:2014cv06083
Plaintiff:
Andrew S Palmer
Defendant:
Lisbeth Anne Murphy, Corizon Medical Services Inc and Correct Care Solution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palmer v. Murphy et al
as 4:2014cv00373
Plaintiff:
Andrew S Palmer
Defendant:
Lisbeth Anne Murphy, Corizon Medical Services Inc and Correct Care Solution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
