Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Wry v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv04060
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wry
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections and Monica Arcc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trotter v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Daniel Trotter
Defendant:
Wendy Marie Miller, Whithney Conney, Howard Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trotter v. Miller et al
as 2:2023cv04240
Plaintiff:
Daniel Trotter
Defendant:
Wendy Marie Miller, Whithney Conney, Howard Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Simpson et al
as 5:2023cv06114
Plaintiff:
Daniel L Wilson
Defendant:
Shona Simpson and Mark Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitaker v. Wilson et al
as 5:2022cv06089
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Whitaker
Defendant:
Sheryl Wilson, Aaron Githens, Karen Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Crews, et al
as 5:2022cv06030
Plaintiff:
Daniel L Wilson
Defendant:
Campbell, Michael Parsons, Ryan Crews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Compton v. Taney County Sheriff's Department
as 6:2021cv03252
Plaintiff:
Daniel Compton
Defendant:
Taney County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ulrich v. Missouri Department of Corrections
as 2:2018cv04246
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Charles Daniels Ulrich, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2018cv06080
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Richard
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Anne L. Precythe, Corizon Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buyalova v. Hall et al
as 3:2018cv05036
Plaintiff:
Elena Ivanova Buyalova
Defendant:
Michael Hall, Madison Parnell, Daisy Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
