Cases 11 - 20 of 374
Patrick McIntosh v. Eric Williams, Warden
as 24-1237
Petitioner:
Patrick Randell McIntosh
Respondent:
Eric Williams, Warden
Cassell v. Commissioner Of Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Matthew Cassell
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Department of Human Services, Visiting Room Supervisor, Visiting Room Employees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daywitt v. Harpstead et al
as 0:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Daywitt
Defendant:
Jodi Harpstead, Nancy Johnston, Douglas Latuseck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grande v. State of MN et al
as 0:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ryan Grande
Defendant:
State of MN, Saint Peter Regional Treatment Center and State of MN Dept. of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hodson v. United States of America, The
as 0:2023cv03569
Plaintiff:
David Joseph Hodson
Defendant:
The United States of America and United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strutton et al v. Hacker et al
as 4:2023cv01134
Plaintiff:
Dennis Strutton and James Moller
Defendant:
Denise Hacker, Christopher Chamberlain, George Killian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindsey v. Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2023cv03299
Plaintiff:
Dale Allen Lindsey
Defendant:
Department of Human Services, Jodi Harpstead, Nicole Boder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McIntosh v. Williams
as 0:2023cv02695
Petitioner:
Patrick Randell McIntosh
Respondent:
Eric Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McGoveran
as 8:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
Mark McGoveran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miles v. Harpsteadt et al
as 0:2023cv02848
Plaintiff:
Gordon Miles
Defendant:
Jodi Harpsteadt, Nancy Johnston and Terry Kneisel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
