Cases 1 - 8 of 8
United States of America v. United States Currency in the Approximate Amounts of $118,245.00 and $69,700.00
as 6:2013cv03168
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
United States Currency in the Approximate Amounts of $118,245.00 and $69,700.00
Claimant:
Marco Maniaci and Lucas John Taggart
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States v. John Nelson
as 13-1902
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
$48,100.00 in United States Currency
Claimant - Appellant:
John R. Nelson
USA v. $50,000.00 in United States Currency
as 4:2013cv00040
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$50,000.00 in United States Currency
Claimant:
John Bayron Pajon
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. 1808 West Broadway, Council Bluffs, Iowa
as 1:2012cv00010
Defendant:
1808 West Broadway, Council Bluffs, Iowa
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
John Feddin
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
United States of America v. United States currency in the amount of $638,202.00 et al
as 2:2012cv04040
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
United States currency in the amount of $638,202.00, Four Platinum Bars, Five Palladium Bars and others
Interested_party:
Kevin Bay , John Hawkins and Bocomo Bay, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
United States of America v. $87,662.56 in United States Currency
as 0:2011cv00754
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$87,662.56 in United States Currency
Claimant:
Ronald John Ide
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841
Bradley v. USA
as 1:2009cv00054
Plaintiff:
John M. Bradley
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. 2006 Specialty Motorcycle
as 2:2007cv04015
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
2006 Specialty Motorcycle
Interested Party:
Patrick John Kehoe
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
