Cases 101 - 110 of 31,154
Owens v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
Delman Owens
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hainline v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Joshua Blake Hainline
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Strange v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
James Strange
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Porter v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2024cv05084
Plaintiff:
Ebony L. Porter
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lager v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01236
Plaintiff:
Scott Lager
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Anderson v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03095
Plaintiff:
Edna Anderson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Watson v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Isiah A Watson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kasper v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2024cv02044
Plaintiff:
Minnie L. Kasper
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Tuttle v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04052
Plaintiff:
Lisa L. Tuttle
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dickau v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv01011
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Dickau
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 423 Social Security Act (Disability Insurance Benefit Payments)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
