Cases 1 - 10 of 31,215
Rozelski v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Laurie A Rozelski
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Usher v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Sonya Usher
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Walsh v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00841
Plaintiff:
Philip Walsh
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Wilder v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00842
Plaintiff:
Amanda Wilder
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Pelton v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv05044
Plaintiff:
Lisa Anderson Pelton
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Schnur v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
Mia Schnur
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ewing v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Ewing
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Fields v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
Charitine Chante Fields
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Taylor v. Martin J. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv02313
Plaintiff:
Martha Alexandra Taylor
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision (regarding payment of benefits)
Baker v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00512
Plaintiff:
Benny Gibson Baker
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
