Cases 1 - 10 of 112
Gaddis v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01348
Plaintiff:
Amy Gaddis
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ritter v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Amy Ritter
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Caesar v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Amy Leigh Caesar
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Frederick v. Kijakazi
as 8:2023cv00518
Plaintiff:
Amy Frederick
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Forquer v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
Amie Forquer
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 423 Social Security Act (Disability Insurance Benefit Payments)
Hahn v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv04026
Plaintiff:
Amy Nicole Hahn
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Frankman v. Kijakazi
as 0:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Amy Frankman
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lawson v. Kijakazi
as 0:2022cv03069
Plaintiff:
Amy Lawson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dare v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv01188
Plaintiff:
Amy M. Dare
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Madison v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2022cv05210
Plaintiff:
Amy Madison
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
