Cases 1 - 10 of 4,322
Dukhorn v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01101
Plaintiff:
Brock W. Dukhorn
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Willett v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Jacob W Willett
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Malone v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 3:2023cv03050
Plaintiff:
Brandon W. Malone
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Lamar v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00761
Plaintiff:
Mark W. Lamar
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Meyer v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv01087
Plaintiff:
Keith W. Meyer
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Muck v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2023cv00604
Plaintiff:
Michael W Muck
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Clayborne v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00364
Plaintiff:
Robert W Clayborne
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Thompson v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00357
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey W. Thompson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Mays v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 3:2023cv03011
Plaintiff:
David W Mays
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Carter v. Kijakazi
as 6:2023cv03034
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey W. Carter
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
