Cases 41 - 48 of 48
United States of America v. Walden Capital Partners L.P.
as 2:2009mc00012
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Walden Capital Partners L.P.
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
USA v. Walden Capital Partners L P
as 4:2009mc00013
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Walden Capital Partners L P
Receiver:
Small Business Administration
USA v. Walden Capital Partners LP
as 4:2009mc00014
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Walden Capital Partners LP
Joshua Bridges, et al v. ContinentalAFA Dispensing Comp, et al
as 09-6015
Debtor:
In re: ContinentalAFA Dispensing Company
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joshua Bridges, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
ContinentalAFA Dispensing Company, Harbinger Capital Partners Master Fund I, Ltd. and Harbinger Capital Partners Special Situations Fund, L.P.
Intervenor - Appellee:
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors
USA v. Walden Capital Partners, LP
as 4:2009mc09007
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Walden Capital Partners, LP
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Ramsey et al v. Beverly Enterprises Inc et al
as 3:2009cv00035
Plaintiff:
Walter Dwayne Ramsey, Walter Dwayne Ramsey, Wanda Grace Ramsey and others
Defendant:
Beverly Enterprises Inc, Beverly Health and Rehabilitation Services Inc, Beverly Enterprises of Arkansas Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Coadum Advisors, Inc. et al
as 1:2008mc00009
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Coadum Advisors, Inc., Mansell Capital Partners III, LLC, James A Jeffrey and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Coadum Advisors, Inc et al
as 1:2008mc00041
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Coadum Advisors, Inc, Mansell Capital Partners III, LLC, James A Jeffrey and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
