Cases 71 - 80 of 129
Christian v. Commerce Bank N.A. et al
as 4:2014cv00201
Plaintiff:
Fred Christian
Defendant:
Commerce Bank N.A. and Jeannine Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Murphy Oil USA, Incorporated v. Enterprise TE Products Pipeline Company, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv01055
Plaintiff:
Murphy Oil USA, Incorporated
Defendant:
Enterprise TE Products Pipeline Company, LLC and Enterprise Products, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
United States v. Anthony Murphy
as 12-3769
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Anthony S. Murphy, also known as Casper
Murphy v. Department of Health and Human Services
as 4:2012cv00629
Plaintiff:
Bruce E Murphy
Defendant:
Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv02538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plumbers' and Pipefitters' Local 562, et al v. Huckstep, et al.
as 4:2012cv01295
Plaintiff:
Plumber's and Pipefitters Local 562 Supplemental Pension Plan and Trust , John O'Mara , James Murphy and others
Defendant:
Peggy Huckstep, Cynthia L Owenby and State of Missouri, Department of Social Services, Family Support Division, Division of Child Support Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv01685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Murphy-Hoffman Company v. Gunn
as 4:2012cv00678
Plaintiff:
Murphy-Hoffman Company
Defendant:
Tamara Gunn
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Michael Murphy v. MO Bd. of Probation & Parole, et al
as 12-8011
Petitioner:
Michael Dunham Murphy
Respondent:
Missouri Board of Probation & Parole, Ellis McSwain, Chuck Prior and others
:
Board Member/Employe John Doe, (# 1-99) and Board Member/Employe Jane Doe, (# 1-99)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
