Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Savage, City of v. Silgan Containers Manufacturing Corporation et al
as 0:2010cv01718
Plaintiff:
Savage, City of
Defendant:
Silgan Containers Manufacturing Corporation, Union Pacific Railroad Company , Bank of America, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 10101
Marion Arkansas, City of v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2009cv00175
Plaintiff:
Marion Arkansas, City of
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
Robertson et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 1:2009cv00020
Plaintiff:
William C Robertson and Carey W Robertson
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and XTO Energy Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Real Property
Crown Communications, Inc. v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2009cv05026
Plaintiff:
Crown Communications, Inc., Crown Communications, Inc. and Crown Communications, Inc.
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 2:2009cv02022
Plaintiff:
Arkansas State Highway Commission
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, Fort Smith Railroad Company, 0.435 Acre, More or Less, of Land in Sebastian County and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Steffens et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2008cv00966
Plaintiff:
James Steffens, BH&W, Inc. and Catron Family LP
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Mahan et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2008cv04183
Plaintiff:
Alan Mahan and Angela Mahan
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
