Cases 131 - 140 of 390
Hughes et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02045
Plaintiff:
Jamall Rideaux, Brandon Dalcourt, Robert Phillips and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02057
Plaintiff:
Francisco Avila, Jacob Zimmerman, Joshua Thompson and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Boshell et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv01983
Plaintiff:
James Spann, Rodrick Butler, Stephen Swix and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Phillips v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2019cv00286
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Clarence Phillips
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Bittinger et al v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2019cv01559
Plaintiff:
Eric Sittner, Scott Peters, Cecilia Kreplak and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Linnen v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv01381
Defendant:
ARIZANT HEALTHCARE, INC., a Delaware corporation,, 3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Phillip Linnen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv01367
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Phillips
Smith et al v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
as 4:2019cv00377
Defendant:
AMF Bowling Centers, Inc. and AMF Pro Bowl Lanes
Plaintiff:
Phillip D Smith and Monica R Tanzey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Casey v. New Prime, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02058
Plaintiff:
Lorie Casey
Defendant:
Phillips Knight, Jr., New Prime, Inc. and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bazoon et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv01007
Plaintiff:
Darrel Griffith, Jesse Hibbs, Aaron Oakes and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Aearo Technologies LLC and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
