Cases 11 - 20 of 210
Matsiko et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02799
Plaintiff:
George Matsiko, Ramadhani Amiisi Matte, Vincent Maviiri and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Hedlund et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02682
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Hedlund, Nicholas Selm, Nicholas Osvatic and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Aearo Holding, LLC, Aearo Intermediate, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Allen et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02634
Plaintiff:
Zackerie Allen, Nicholas Amatuzzo, Edwin Among and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Abelon et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02589
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Hawkins, Jeffrey Herrington, Renita Jackson and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Morris v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02344
Plaintiff:
Robert Morris
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Wagner et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00678
Plaintiff:
James Wagner, Johnathan Wagner, Boyd A. Walker, Jr. and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Jefferson et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00369
Plaintiff:
Troy Jefferson, Jennifer Light, Robert Summers and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Tester et al v. Exactech Inc et al
as 4:2022cv01100
Plaintiff:
Sandra Tester and Morris Tester
Defendant:
Exactech Inc and Exactech US Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury-Product Liability
Morris v. DeQueen and Eastern Railroad, LLC
as 4:2022cv04060
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Shane Morris
Defendant:
DeQueen and Eastern Railroad, LLC
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Morris v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00643
Plaintiff:
Beth Morris
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
