Cases 1 - 10 of 238
LaSundra Flournoy v. Brandon Estelle, et al
as 24-2011
Plaintiff:
LaSundra Flournoy
Defendant:
Brandon Estelle and Graceway Church
Mumford et al v. Safelite Group Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Virginia Mumford and Brandon Mumford
Defendant:
Safelite Group Inc and Hunter Lee Roberson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Flournoy v. Estelle et al
as 4:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
LaSundra Flournoy
Defendant:
Brandon Estelle and Graceway Church
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Scott v. Emmens et al
as 3:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Jerron Scott
Defendant:
Brandon Emmens and Gorbel Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Brooks v. Boyd et al
as 4:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Rohan Brooks
Defendant:
Brandon Boyd and One Gone Transport LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
May v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv00610
Plaintiff:
Brandon May
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Brandon v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
Charles Brandon and Charles L. Brandon
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Larson, et al v. Trinity Logistics Incorporated of Delaware
as 5:2023cv06166
Defendant:
Trinity Logistics Incorporated of Delaware, Trinity Logistics Inc. and Trinity Logistics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Amanda Larson and Brandon Larson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith v. SMS Group Inc et al
as 3:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
Brandon Smith
Defendant:
SMS Group Inc, SMS Group GmbH, SMS USA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury-Product Liability
Bodznick v. Agape Baptist Church Inc
as 6:2023cv03270
Plaintiff:
Brandon Bodznick
Defendant:
Agape Baptist Church, Inc. doing business as Agape Boarding School
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
