Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Cross v. Phelps County, Missouri et al
as 4:2016cv00217
Plaintiff:
Becky Cross
Defendant:
Phelps County, Missouri, William E. Hickle, Sue Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daugherty v. Pring et al
as 4:2016cv00183
Plaintiff:
Phyllis M. Daugherty
Defendant:
Linda Pring, USA Mortgage/DAS Acquisition, Bank of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sloan v. Phelps County, Missouri et al
as 4:2016cv00086
Plaintiff:
Jessica A. Sloan
Defendant:
Phelps County, Missouri , Richard Lisenbe , Greg Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gyronne Buckley v. Keith Ray, et al
as 15-3656
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gyronne Buckley
Defendant - Appellee:
Keith Ray, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Agent operating under the authority of the South Central Drug Task Force, Linda Card, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Agent operating under the authority of the South Central Drug Task Force, Richard Wiggins, "Rip" Individually and in his Official Capacity as Agent operating under the authority of the South Central Drug Task Force and others
Gyronne Buckley v. Keith Ray, et al
as 15-3481
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gyronne Buckley
Defendant - Appellee:
Keith Ray, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Agent operating under the authority of the South Central Drug Task Force, Linda Card, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Agent operating under the authority of the South Central Drug Task Force, Richard Wiggins, "Rip" Individually and in his Official Capacity as Agent operating under the authority of the South Central Drug Task Force and others
Shirley Phelps-Roper v. Chris Koster, et al
as 15-1102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Shirley Phelps-Roper
Defendant - Appellee:
Chris Koster, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Missouri, Jeremiah W. Nixon, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Missouri and Ronald K. Repogle, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Missouri State Highway Patrol
Defendant:
Mark Goodwin, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for Carroll County, Angie Hemphill Wright, in her official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for Laclede County, Richard E. Wrinkle, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Laclede County and others
Buckley v. Ray et al
as 5:2014cv00435
Plaintiff:
Gyronne Buckley
Defendant:
Keith Ray, Linda Card, Richard Wiggins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Shirley Phelps-Roper v. Chris Koster, et al
as 14-3266
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Shirley Phelps-Roper
Defendant - Appellant:
Chris Koster, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Missouri, Jeremiah W. Nixon, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Missouri and Ronald K. Repogle, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Missouri State Highway Patrol
Defendant:
Mark Goodwin, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for Carroll County, Angie Hemphill Wright, in her official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for Laclede County, Richard E. Wrinkle, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Laclede County and others
Shirley Phelps-Roper v. Chris Koster, et al
as 14-3058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Shirley Phelps-Roper
Defendant - Appellee:
Chris Koster, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Missouri, Jeremiah W. Nixon, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Missouri and Ronald K. Repogle, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Missouri State Highway Patrol
Defendant:
Mark Goodwin, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for Carroll County, Angie Hemphill Wright, in her official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for Laclede County, Richard E. Wrinkle, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Laclede County and others
Shirley Phelps-Roper, et al v. County of St. Charle
as 14-1008
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Shirley L. Phelps-Roper and Megan Phelps-Roper
Defendant - Appellee:
County of St. Charles, Missouri
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
