Cases 11 - 20 of 1,556
Valentine-Williams v. City of Omaha, Nebraska
as 8:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
LaWanda J. Valentine-Williams
Defendant:
City of Omaha, Nebraska and Jane and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rundquist: v. Crane et al
as 4:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Scott-Gregory Rundquist:
Defendant:
Sue Crane, Family Support Division, Andrew Bailey and others
Rosie Davis v. William Franks
as 24-1927
Plaintiff:
Rosie L. Davis
Defendant:
William Dale Franks
Intervenor:
Arkansas Department of Education, The and Arkansas State Board of Education, The
City of Creve Coeur v. Williams
as 4:2024cv00353
Defendant:
Alisha R. Williams and Alisha N. Bey
Plaintiff:
City of Creve Coeur
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Blankenship v. Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners et al
as 4:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Shane Blankenship
Defendant:
Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners, E. Williams and A Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Uwazurike et al v. State of Iowa et al
as 4:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Eyioma Uwazurike, Noah Shannon, Nelson Brands and others
Defendant:
State of Iowa, Iowa Department of Public Safety, Iowa Division of Criminal Investigation (DCI) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Williams-Goode et al v. Division of Youth Services
as 4:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Williams-Goode and S.B.
Defendant:
Division of Youth Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
