Cases 11 - 20 of 37,657
Aunhkhotep v. Doe et al
as 4:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
Aunhk Ra Aunhkhotep
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Police Officer Unknown Ebberhart, Police Captain Unknown Karnowski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00705
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Elliott v. Cowan et al
as 4:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Sarah Dawn Elliott
Defendant:
Matthew Cowan, Kearia Railey, Scott Childers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Light v. Missouri Department of Social Services et al
as 6:2024cv03153
Plaintiff:
Betty J. Light
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Social Services and United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Johnson v. Lew et al
as 0:2024cv01858
Plaintiff:
Chakotay Bobbie James Johnson
Defendant:
Daniel K. Lew, State of Minnesota Sixth Judicial District Public Defender and Center for Changing Lives
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. City of North Branch, Minnesota
as 0:2024cv01868
Plaintiff:
Eric Smith
Defendant:
City of North Branch, Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanderson v. Myrdal
as 3:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Mitchell S. Sanderson
Defendant:
Janne Myrdal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
