Cases 21 - 30 of 749
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Paul Rosberg v. Mark Johnson, et al
as 23-3653
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Paul A. Rosberg
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant / Appellee:
Mark Johnson, Chancery Court Judge for the District of Nebraska and Robert B. Evnen, Secretary of State of Nebraska
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv03789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
McNeal v. Calvin et al
as 4:2023cv01732
Plaintiff:
Syreeta LaShawn McNeal, Esq.
Defendant:
Vera L. Calvin, Anthony T. Lofties, Joann A. Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jose Perez v. Joseph Biden, Jr., et al
as 23-3681
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jose A. Perez
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, Merrick B. Garland, US Attorney General and United States Department of Justice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3419
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
