Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Goodale v. Lampo et al
as 6:2012cv06115
Plaintiff:
Thomas Goodale
Defendant:
Jerry Lampo, Garland County, Garland County Road Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
City of Shorewood v. Ronald Johnson, et al
as 12-3020
Plaintiff - Appellee:
City of Shorewood
Defendant - Appellant:
Ronald Richard Johnson and Dee Lundberg Johnson
Derrol Kirby, III v. John Roth, et al
as 12-1987
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Derrol Dee Kirby, III
Defendant - Appellee:
John Roth, Ex Police Chief of Barling Police Department, Larry Merchant, Next in charge under Police Chief, Barling Police Department, Kevin Dougan, Barling Patrolman, Barling Police Department and others
Vice v. The City of Bentonville et al
as 5:2012cv05017
Plaintiff:
Dee Anna Vice
Defendant:
The City of Bentonville, James Allen, David Undiano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv04012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv00050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Pease v. Pease et al
as 0:2011cv00617
Plaintiff:
David P. Pease
Defendant:
Dee Ann C. Pease , Olmsted County Child and Family Services , University of Minnesota Extension Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1497
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Shorewood, City of v. Johnson et al
as 0:2011cv00374
Plaintiff:
Shorewood, City of
Defendant:
Ronald R. Johnson and Dee L. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Britton et al v. Ritchie et al
as 0:2011cv00093
Plaintiff:
Audrey Britton , David Bly , Cary Coop and others
Defendant:
Mark Ritchie , Rachel Smith , Fran Windschitl and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Sara Hippert , Dave Greer , Linda Markowitz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
