Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Mariama Moore v. Hamline University, et al
as 24-1959
Plaintiff:
Mariama Djenaba Moore
Defendant:
Hamline University, Deans of Students, Hamline University Residential Life and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Moore v. Hamline University et al
as 0:2023cv03723
Plaintiff:
Mariama Moore
Defendant:
Hamline University, Deans of Students, Hamline University Residential Life and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Drago et al
as 4:2023cv01486
Plaintiff:
Ryan Drago and Carlos Phillips
Defendant:
City of St. Louis and Ryan J. Drago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Alana Phillips v. Carlos Rocha, et al
as 23-3139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alana S. Phillips
Defendant / Appellee:
Dr. Carlos Rocha, Mena Regional Health System Hospital Commission Member, Michael Myers, Mena Regional Health System Hospital Commission Member, Leon Philpot, Mena Regional Health System Hospital Commission Member and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities-Employment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1027
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Phillips v. Rocha et al
as 2:2022cv02181
Plaintiff:
Alana S. Phillips
Defendant:
Dr. Carlos Rocha, Michael Myers, Leon Philpot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
