Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Jennifer Harmon v. Preferred Family Healthcare, Inc., et al
as 23-2691
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jennifer Harmon, individually and as surviving mother of N.J. and on behalf of the Class of Persons Designated by R.S. MO Section 537.080
Defendant / Appellee:
Preferred Family Healthcare, Inc., Second Judicial Circuit of the State of Missouri, Jeff Hall, individually, and in his individual capacity and others
Defendant:
Tracy Francis, individually, and in her individual capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv03122
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-4376
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-4372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kyle Rhodes, et al v. Kroger Company, et al
as 15-3187
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Kyle Rhodes, Individually and as Plaintiff Class Representative, Wesley Atwood, Individually and as Plaintiff Class Representative and Samantha Hudon, Individually and as Plaintiff Class Representative
Defendant - Appellant:
Kroger Company, Andrea Tyson and Patrick Scherrey
W.T. Davis, et al v. Cutter Morning Star School, et al
as 15-1919
Plaintiff - Appellee:
W.T. Davis, Individually and on behalf of a Class of Taxpayers of Garland County, Arkansas, Similarly Situated, and and Garland County Chapter of the N.A.A.C.P.
Defendant:
Hot Springs School District, Arkansas, State of, Arkansas State Board of Education and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Cutter Morning Star School District, Fountain Lake School District, Jessieville School District and others
Tisdell et al v. Senior Class Care et al
as 0:2013cv02530
Plaintiff:
Brian Tisdell and Tammy Tisdell
Defendant:
Senior Class Care, Angelga Sandlin, Sandlin Law Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Hoosman et al v. 1st Class Security, Inc et al
as 6:2013cv02044
Plaintiff:
Cornell A Hoosman and Delisha R Hoosman
Defendant:
1st Class Security, Inc, Menard, Inc, Brian Haugen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lorene Joshua, et al v. State of Arkansas, et al
as 13-1488
Plaintiff:
Little Rock School District, Dale Charles, Robert L. Brown, Sr. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
North Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association, Pulaski Association of Classroom Teachers, Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association and others
Interested Party:
John Harrison
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellant:
Lorene Joshua, Leslie Joshua, Stacy Joshua and others
Defendant:
North Little Rock School District, Pulaski County Special School District, Pulaski County Board of Education and others
Defendant - Appellee:
State of Arkansas
Respondent:
Arkansas Department of Education
Claimant:
Office of Desegregation Monitoring
Intervenor Defendant:
Blytheville School District, Bryant School District, Fort Smith School District and others
Intervenor Defendant - Appellee:
Wilson Community Development Corporation, Lighthouse Academies of Arkansas, Inc., Arkansas Virtual Academy and others
Little Rock School District v. Wilson Comm. Develop. Corp., et al
as 13-1483
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Little Rock School District
Intervenor Plaintiff:
North Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association, Pulaski Association of Classroom Teachers, Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association and others
Interested Party:
John Harrison
Plaintiff:
Dale Charles, Robert L. Brown, Sr., Gwen Hevey Jackson and others
Defendant:
North Little Rock School District, Pulaski County Special School District, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent:
Arkansas Department of Education
Claimant:
Office of Desegregation Monitoring
Intervenor Defendant:
Blytheville School District, Bryant School District, Fort Smith School District and others
Intervenor Defendant - Appellant:
Wilson Community Development Corporation, Lighthouse Academies of Arkansas, Inc., Arkansas Virtual Academy and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
