Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Wheelock v. Nitzschke et al
as 5:2023cv04053
Plaintiff:
Douglas A Wheelock
Defendant:
Andrew J Nitzschke, Connor Roos, Daniel Luesebrink and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Neighborhood Enterprises, et al v. City of St. Louis, et al
as 14-2261
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Neighborhood Enterprises, Inc., Sanctuary in the Ordinary and Jim Roos
Defendant - Appellee:
City of St. Louis and St. Louis Board of Adjustment
Defendant:
Shari Cunningham, George Hitt, Joe Klitzing and others
Neighborhood Enterprises, Inc., et al v. City of St. Louis, et al
as 10-1937
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Neighborhood Enterprises, Inc., Sanctuary in the Ordinary and Jim Roos
Defendant - Appellee:
City of St. Louis and St. Louis Board of Adjustment
Defendant:
Shari Cunningham, George Hitt, Joe Klitzing and others
Neighborhood Enterprises, et al v. City of St. Louis, et al
as 07-3673
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Neighborhood Enterprises, Inc., Sanctuary in the Ordinary and Jim Roos
Defendant - Appellee:
City of St. Louis, St. Louis Redevelopment Corporation, Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority and others
Neighborhood Enterprises, Inc. et al v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2007cv01546
Plaintiff:
Neighborhood Enterprises, Inc., Neighborhood Enterprises, Inc., Neighborhood Enterprises, Inc. and others
Defendant:
St. Louis, City of, St. Louis Board of Adjustment, Shari Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Neighborhood Enterprises, Inc. et al v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2007cv01505
Plaintiff:
Neighborhood Enterprises, Inc., Neighborhood Enterprises, Inc., Neighborhood Enterprises, Inc. and others
Defendant:
St. Louis, City of, St. Louis Development Corporation, Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
