Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Servose v. City of Lincoln et al
as 4:2021cv03088
Defendant:
Jeffrey Bliemeister, City of Lincoln, Lancaster County and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Servose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Poole et al v. Lincoln et al
as 4:2021cv03030
Defendant:
City of Lincoln, Lancaster County, Terry Wagner and others
Plaintiff:
Elise Poole and Jackie Buntgen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv00401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Murren v. Lower Platte North Natural Resources District et al
as 4:2017cv03154
Defendant:
Matt Bailey, Joe Birkel, Bob Clausen and others
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Murren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kennedy v. McDonald
as 8:2015cv00389
Plaintiff:
Terry Kennedy
Defendant:
Robert A. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Brundo v. All Saints Catholic School et al
as 8:2013cv00156
Defendant:
All Other Known and Unknown Member of the Board, All Other Known and Unknown Members, All Other Known and Unknown Members and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara Mrzlak Brundo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gould v. Union Pacific Railroad et al
as 8:2013cv00039
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Gould
Defendant:
Jack Hamer, Terry Turner, Union Pacific Railroad and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv00361
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
