Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Frank Watts, II v. Asa Hutchinson, et al
as 23-2284
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Frank Watts, II
Defendant / Appellee:
Asa Hutchinson, Hon. Governor, and/or His Predecessors & Successor, Morris Thompson, Former Cir. Ct. Judge & Law Firm, and/or His Successor, Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections, and/or Her Predecessors & Successor and others
Watts v. Hutchinson et al
as 4:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Frank Watts, II
Defendant:
Asa Hutchinson, Morris Thompson, Wendy Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Arnett v. Norris et al
as 3:2021cv00088
Defendant:
Nurzuhal Faust, Wendy Kelley, Christopher Budnik and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Arnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Easley et al
as 4:2019cv00546
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bailey
Defendant:
Ron Ball, Wendy Kelley, Gregory Crain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biddle et al v. Kelley et al
as 4:2019cv00327
Defendant:
William Straughn, Wendy Kelley, Kennie Bolden and others
Plaintiff:
LaDeana Biddle and Jane Roes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Easley et al
as 4:2019cv00063
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bailey
Defendant:
Ron Ball, Wendy Kelley, Gregory Crain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cater v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 5:2018cv00047
Plaintiff:
Timothy Cater
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction, Wendy Kelley, Dale Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 5:2017cv00296
Plaintiff:
Rose Loronta Lawrence
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Wendy Kelley, Arkansas Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnett v. Norris et al
as 1:2017cv00076
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Arnett
Defendant:
Larry Norris, Roy Hobbs, Wendy Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Kelley et al
as 5:2017cv00111
Plaintiff:
Jack Harold Jones
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley , Rory Griffin and Dale Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
