Cases 101 - 110 of 132
Bell v. Scott et al
as 4:2013cv02097
Plaintiff:
Robert Bell, Jr.
Defendant:
Charles Scott, M.D., Corizon, John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Lombardi et al
as 6:2013cv03229
Plaintiff:
Joseph V. Williams
Defendant:
George Lombardi, Cyndi Prudden, Michael Bowersox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Granberry v. Bernard Ploch, et al
as 13-1546
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James E. Granberry
Defendant - Appellee:
Bernard P. Ploch, Denis Agniel, Vicky Meyers and others
Barton v. Kintner et al
as 2:2012cv04266
Plaintiff:
John Barton
Defendant:
Scott Kintner and Tammy Surface
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barton v. Wade
as 4:2012cv01099
Plaintiff:
John Barton
Defendant:
Corey Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Barton v. John Maples, et al
as 12-2368
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick Jody Barton
Defendant - Appellee:
John Maples, Warden, Grimes Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction, Fowler, Correctional Officer, Grimes Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction and Barbara Williams, Inmate Grievance Supervisor, Diagnostic Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction
Matthew King v. William Barton, et al
as 12-2173
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Matthew King
Defendant - Appellee:
William Barton, Unit Program Supervisor, Officially and Individually and Scott Jordan, Unit Manager, Officially and Individually
Barton v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2012cv00772
Plaintiff:
John Barton
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections and Corey Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barton v. Maples et al
as 1:2012cv00038
Plaintiff:
Frederick Jody Barton
Defendant:
John Maples, Fowler and Barbara Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kory Clay v. Michael Bowersox, et al
as 12-1423
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kory S. Clay
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael Bowersox, Preston Cooper, Tamara Stell and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
