Cases 11 - 20 of 784
Hill v. WellPath Medical Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
WellPath Medical Corporation, Kent, Rory Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. Gucci Store Franchise and Distribution et al
as 6:2024cv06040
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus and IamsuiTitus
Defendant:
Gucci Store Franchise and Distribution, Givendy Distribution, Back to the Future (the Movie) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Levac v. Haney et al
as 4:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Daniel Levac
Defendant:
Sarah Haney, Travis Hill, Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. USA
as 4:2024cv00400
Petitioner:
Robert Hill
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Elmore v. Shipman et al
as 4:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
James Shipman, Mariece Culclager, Shelby Huston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cowgill v. Shipman et al
as 4:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Jeffery S Cowgill
Defendant:
James Shipman, Mariece Culclager, Shelby Huston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Harmon et al
as 4:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Anthony Smith
Defendant:
Jarod Harmon, Veros, Jamie Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zeckeya Perry v. Asa Hutchinson, et al
as 24-1069
Plaintiff:
Zeckeya Perry
Defendant:
Asa Hutchinson, Former Governor, State of Arkansas, Wendy Kelley, Secretary of Corrections, ADC, Dexter Payne, Director, ADC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deandre Neal-Hill v. United States
as 23-3666
Petitioner / Appellant:
Deandre Lenier Neal-Hill
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
