Cases 11 - 20 of 1,556
Andrews v. Well Path et al
as 4:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Donald S Andrews, Jr
Defendant:
Well Path, Corrective Care Solutions, Wendy Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. King et al
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Adam Lane
Defendant:
Josephus J King, Jackson, Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Marlon Terryonna Smith
Defendant:
Jeremy H Jones, Jasmine Jackson and ADC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ledkins v. Jackson et al
as 3:2024cv03027
Plaintiff:
Paul Eugene Ledkins
Defendant:
Mayor Jerry Jackson, Jeremy Ragland, Mitch Magness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moseley v. Henderson et al
as 4:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Kelshaun D Moseley
Defendant:
Henderson, Watson, Ahka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Striegel v. White et al
as 6:2024cv06069
Plaintiff:
Nathan F. Striegel
Defendant:
Warden White, Major Otts and Lt. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rickie Tigue, Jr. v. Belcher, et al
as 24-1669
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lynn Tigue, Jr. and Rickie Lynn Tigue, Jr.
Defendant:
Belcher, RN, EARU, ADC, Gary Kerstein, EARU, ADC, Kelley, Lt., EARU, ADC and others
Millsaps v. Jackson et al
as 2:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Kane Derrick Millsaps
Defendant:
Moses Jackson and Michael Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rickie Tigue, Jr. v. Moses Jackson, et al
as 24-2029
Plaintiff:
Rickie Lynn Tigue, Jr.
Defendant:
Moses Jackson, Warden, EARU, Brickey's Max, Johnson, Warden, EARU, Brickey's Max, Allison, Major, EARU, Brickey's Max and others
Buford v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Stephen Louis Shermond Buford
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, James Gibson and Anthony Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
