Cases 21 - 30 of 918
Ferry v. Ross et al
as 5:2024cv05034
Plaintiff:
Matthew Alan Ferry
Defendant:
Lieutenant Tyler Ross, Deputy Cain, Deputy White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Augustine et al
as 4:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Richard T. Arnold
Defendant:
Kenneth P. Augustine, Christopher Neace, Luke James Stobie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew Tornquist v. State of South Dakota, et al
as 24-1170
Petitioner:
Matthew C. Tornquist
Respondent:
State of South Dakota, Kellie Wasko, Secretary of Corrections, Teresa L. Bittinger, Warden of SDSP and others
Covington v. Pyatt
as 4:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Kevin Covington
Defendant:
Matthew Pyatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tate v. Durrett et al
as 5:2024cv05020
Plaintiff:
Zerahzhe Authentic Tate
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney Matthew Durrett, Head Public Defender Blake Chancellor, Public Defender Candice Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. State of Iowa
as 4:2024cv00022
Petitioner:
Micah Sherif Matthews
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boivin v. Huckabee-Sanders et al
as 4:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Matthew Boivin
Defendant:
Sarah Huckabee-Sanders, Gary Mussellwhite and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew Houston v. Calvin Johnson, et al
as 24-1092
Petitioner:
Matthew Travis Houston
Respondent:
Calvin Johnson and Unknown Defendants
Matthew Houston v. Encore Event Technologies, et al
as 24-1093
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
Encore Event Technologies, Encore Productions, Encore Event Services and others
Israel v. Fenner et al
as 4:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
CessanadaKha Jahish Israel
Defendant:
Duane Edward Fenner, Holmes, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
