Cases 31 - 40 of 290
Martin v. Byers et al
as 4:2022cv00644
Plaintiff:
Tavarus Martin
Defendant:
Jared Byers, Jimmy Coleman, IV, Edgewar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Thurston et al
as 6:2022cv06049
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Pittman
Defendant:
John Thurston, Dexter Payne, Dr. Thomas Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Yates
as 2:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Gregory Andre Coleman
Defendant:
Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Coleman v. Yates
as 2:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Paul Bernard Coleman
Defendant:
Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Howell v. Kennon et al
as 4:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
Alexander Howell
Defendant:
Jimmy Kennon, Unknown Coleman, Lloyd Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Buckner
as 4:2022cv00125
Petitioner:
Larry Lee Coleman
Defendant:
Scanning Program - South Central Corr Center
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gregory Barnes v. Clark Green, et al
as 21-3937
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gregory Barnes
Defendant / Appellee:
Clark Green, Officer (originally named as C Green), Dillon McKee, Officer (originally named as Dillion), Kevin Archer, Intake Officer, Dallas County Detention Center (Originally named as "Doe") and others
Coleman v. Stange
as 1:2022cv00010
Petitioner:
Donald Coleman
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman v. Buckner
as 4:2022cv00046
Petitioner:
Larry Lee Coleman
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pittman v. Payne et al
as 6:2021cv06133
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Pittman
Defendant:
Director Dexter Payne, Chief Dep Director Dale Marshall Reed, Sergeant Michael Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
