Cases 31 - 40 of 42
House v. Slay et al
as 4:2010cv01770
Plaintiff:
Russel House
Defendant:
Francis Slay, Eugene Stubblefield, Jerome Fields and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McVay v. Faulkner County Arkansas Circuit Court et al
as 4:2010cv01328
Plaintiff:
Stantwon Irvin McVay
Defendant:
Faulkner County Arkansas Circuit Court, Karl Byrd, Troy Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anastasia Seger v. Larry Norris, et al
as 10-2711
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anastasia L. Seger, formerly known as Lee R. Fielding
Defendant - Appellee:
Larry Norris, Retired Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, R. Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Wendy Kelly, Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Irvin Gamblin v. Jill McGuire
as 10-2242
Petitioner - Appellant:
Irvin Lee Gamblin
Respondent - Appellee:
Jill McGuire
Seger v. Norris et al
as 5:2010cv00081
Plaintiff:
Anastasia L Seger
Defendant:
Larry Norris, R Hobbs, Wendy Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irvin v. USA
as 4:2010cv00107
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Irvin
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gamblin v. McGuire
as 4:2010cv00243
Petitioner:
Irvin Lee Gamblin
Respondent:
Jill McGuire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States v. Kenneth Irvin
as 09-1658
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Kenneth Ray Irvin
Hopper v. Norris et al
as 1:2009cv00007
Plaintiff:
Carl Michael Hopper
Defendant:
Larry Norris, Wendy Kelley and J Irvin
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rill v. St. Clair County Jail et al
as 4:2008cv00096
Plaintiff:
Irvin John Rill
Defendant:
St. Clair County Jail, St. Clair County, Ron Snodgrass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
