Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Jonathan Riches v. John Karr, et al
as 08-3409
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant - Appellee:
John Mark Karr, also known as The Father, Andrea Yates, also known as The Mother, Dylan Klebold, also known as The Son and others
Riches v. Leterrier et al
as 6:2008cv03245
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
Louis Leterrier, Bryan Bertino, Dennis Dugan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. Chacon et al
as 4:2008cv00494
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
Shawn Chacon, Ed Wade and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. Dubai International Financial Centre et al
as 4:2008cv03138
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
Dubai International Financial Centre, Dubai International Financial Exchange, Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Riches v. Kato et al
as 1:2008cv00099
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Tomohiro Kato, Mohammed Al-Qahtani and Mustafa Al-Hawsawi
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv00098
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, Bhopal and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. Urban Outfitters Inc
as 4:2008cv00232
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
Urban Outfitters Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. Massaro et al
as 6:2008cv02042
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Ashley Massaro, Tishara Cousino and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. Bolten et al
as 4:2008cv00404
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
Joshua B. Bolten, John C. Yoo and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. Oswalt et al
as 4:2008cv00330
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
Roy Oswalt, Bureau of Prisons and State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
