Cases 41 - 50 of 4,872
Shawn Duncan v. Joshua Tessier, et al
as 24-1481
Plaintiff:
Shawn Kenya Duncan
Defendant:
Joshua Tessier, Head Practitioner, Naphcare, Polk County Jail and others
Leist v. Griffin et al
as 4:2024cv00578
Plaintiff:
Zachery Leist
Defendant:
Tyler Griffin, C. James and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Honora Patterson v. Doug Witte, et al
as 24-1818
Plaintiff:
Honora Tremaine Patterson
Defendant:
Doug Witte, Correctional Officer, Pat Barnum, Correctional Officer, Alexandra O'Brien, Nurse and others
Lackie v. Dennis et al
as 4:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Richard Daniel Lackie
Defendant:
Dennis, John Putman and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watts v. Hess et al
as 3:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Jerod Watts
Defendant:
Jessica Hess, Shane Russell, Tyler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayfield v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
William Mayfield
Defendant:
Doe and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Parkins v. Deigarion Staten, et al
as 24-1814
Plaintiff:
Michael Justin Parkins
Defendant:
Deigarion M. Staten, Corporal, East Arkansas Regional Unit, Scott Taylor, Major, East Arkansas Regional Unit, Watson, Lt., East Arkansas Regional Unit and others
Tate v. Jackson et al
as 5:2024cv05093
Plaintiff:
Zerahzhe Authentic Tate
Defendant:
Officer J. Jackson, Special Agent Devito and John or Jane Doe Officers or Agents #1 to #3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Does
as 2:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Monica Morris
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Standridge v. Pierce et al
as 4:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Tyler Standridge
Defendant:
Pierce, Wade and Does Classification and CO 1, Cummins Unit, ADC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
