Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Tina Emerson v. Ray Hobb
as 13-3442
Plaintiff - Appellant: Tina M. Emerson
Defendant - Appellee: Ray Hobbs, Arkansas Department of Corrections Director
LeSieur v. Russell
as 4:2013cv01011
Petitioner: Carl Emerson LeSieur
Respondent: Terry Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mark Willey v. John Fayram
as 13-3096
Petitioner - Appellant: Mark Emerson Willey
Respondent - Appellee: Warden John Fayram
Emerson v. Hobbs We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013cv00136
Plaintiff: Tina M Emerson
Defendant: Ray Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Emerson v. Hobbs et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv00449
Plaintiff: Tina Emerson
Defendant: Ray Hobbs and Dustin McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emerson v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2012cv05259
Plaintiff: Tina Emerson
Defendant: Ray Hobbs and Dustin McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emerson v. Williams et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00129
Plaintiff: Tina Emerson
Defendant: Williams and Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emerson v. Williams et al
as 5:2012cv05257
Plaintiff: Tina Emerson
Defendant: Williams, Mr., State Insurer or Hippa and Medicaid and Medicare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tina Emerson v. Maples, et al
as 12-3453
Plaintiff - Appellant: Tina M. Emerson
Defendant - Appellee: Maples, Warden, McPherson Unit, ADC, Faust, Bradley, Warden, McPherson Unit, ADC and others
Emerson v. Maples We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2012cv06116
Plaintiff: Tina M. Emerson
Defendant: Maples
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?