Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 139
Duop v. Secretary of Department of Homeland Security et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2018cv01645
Petitioner: Alier Garang Duop
Defendant: Secretary of Department of Homeland Security , Jefferson Sessions , Scott Baniecke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Joseph Flying Horse v. James Hansen, et al
as 18-1118
Plaintiff / Appellant: Joseph R. Flying Horse
Defendant / Appellee: James Hansen, Parole Agent, Sued in his Official and Individual Capacities, Doug Clark, Supervising Parole Agent, Sued in his Official and Individual Capacities, Krista Bast, Case Manager, Sued in her Official and Individual Capacities and others
Defendant: Stacy Cole, Board Staff, Sued in her Official and Individual Capacities, Kayla Stucky, Board Staff, Sued in her Official and Individual Capacities, Ashley McDonald, DOC Attorney, Sued in her Official and Individual Capacities and others
Joseph Flying Horse v. James Hansen, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-1118
Plaintiff - Appellant: Joseph R. Flying Horse
Defendant - Appellee: James Hansen, Parole Agent, Sued in his Official and Individual Capacities, Doug Clark, Supervising Parole Agent, Sued in his Official and Individual Capacities, Krista Bast, Case Manager, Sued in her Official and Individual Capacities and others
Defendant: Stacy Cole, Board Staff, Sued in her Official and Individual Capacities, Kayla Stucky, Board Staff, Sued in her Official and Individual Capacities, Ashley McDonald, DOC Attorney, Sued in her Official and Individual Capacities and others
Charles Sisney v. Denny Kaemingk, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-4480
Plaintiff - Appellant: Charles E. Sisney
Defendant - Appellee: Denny Kaemingk, in his official capacity as the South Dakota Secretary of Corrections, Darin Young, in his official capacity as the Warden of the South Dakota State Penitentiary, Sharon Reimann, in her official capacity as an SDSP designated Mailroom Officer and others
Charles Sisney v. Denny Kaemingk, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-4313
Plaintiff - Appellee: Charles E. Sisney
Defendant - Appellant: Denny Kaemingk, in his official capacity as the South Dakota Secretary of Corrections, Darin Young, in his official capacity as the Warden of the South Dakota State Penitentiary, Sharon Reimann, in her official capacity as an SDSP designated Mailroom Officer and others
Charles Sisney v. Denny Kaemingk, et al
as 16-4108
Plaintiff - Appellee: Charles E. Sisney
Defendant - Appellant: Denny Kaemingk, in his official capacity as the South Dakota Secretary of Corrections, Darin Young, in his official capacity as the Warden of the South Dakota State Penitentiary, Sharon Reimann, in her official capacity as an SDSP designated Mailroom Officer and others
Strawder v. State of Nebraska et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv03161
Defendant: Scott R. Frakes, Secretary of State John Gale, Neb Attorney Gen Douglas J. Peterson and others
Plaintiff: Thomas Duane Strawder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alan Doering v. John Felts, et al
as 16-3906
Plaintiff - Appellant: Alan Lewis Doering
Defendant - Appellee: John Felts, Chairman, Arkansas Parole Board, Andy Shock, Commissioner, Arkansas Parole Board, Richard Brown, Jr., Vice Chairman, Arkansas Parole Board and others
Nicholas Addison v. Kim Muse, et al
as 16-3870
Plaintiff - Appellant: Nicholas Cortez Addison
Defendant - Appellee: Kim Muse, Secretary, Poinsett County Detention Center, Larry Mills, Sheriff, Poinsett County and Kevin Nouder, Chief Deputy
Defendant: Tristain Marshall, Administrator
Wattleton v. Simon et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2016cv02707
Plaintiff: David Earl Wattleton
Defendant: Stephen F. Simon , Bradley K. Anderson , State of Minnesota and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?