Cases 61 - 70 of 125
Mullins v. Phelps County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2016cv01188
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Mullins
Defendant:
Phelps County Sheriff's Department, Phelps County Jail, John Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Saline County Sheriff's Department
as 4:2016cv00493
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Allen
Defendant:
Saline County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. U.S. Marshals Service et al
as 1:2016cv00169
Plaintiff:
John Kelly
Defendant:
Dunklin County Sheriff's Department, Nicole Green and Bob Holder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waller v. Green et al
as 1:2016cv00123
Plaintiff:
James Waller
Defendant:
Nicole Green, Bob Holder, Ned Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cummings v. Bates County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2016cv00485
Plaintiff:
Michael Cummings
Defendant:
Bates County Sheriff's Department, Chad Anderson, Barry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaFlamme v. Camden County Sheriff's Department
as 2:2016cv04061
Plaintiff:
Donald George LaFlamme
Defendant:
Camden County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. Scott County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2016cv00018
Plaintiff:
Dean Marteze Porter
Defendant:
Scott County Sheriff's Department, Brian Clark, Leon Baugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. Swope et al
as 4:2015cv00421
Plaintiff:
Jacob Andrew Barnett
Defendant:
Chris Swope , Jason Fuller and Wapello County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chance v. Washington County, Arkansas et al
as 5:2015cv05250
Plaintiff:
Glenn Chance
Defendant:
Washington County, Arkansas and Washington County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Summers v. Putnam County Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2015cv06122
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Summers
Defendant:
Putnam County Sheriff's Department and Unionville MO Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
