Cases 71 - 80 of 7,138
Marlin Thomas v. United States, et al
as 24-1662
Plaintiff:
Marlin Santana Thomas
Defendant:
United States of America, Virginia Bruner, Former Assistant United States Attorney, in an individual and official capacity, Amy L Jennings, Assistant United States Attorney, in an individual and official capacity and others
Clifton Cannon v. United States
as 24-1655
Petitioner:
Clifton Terrell Cannon
Respondent:
United States of America
Becerra v. United States of America
as 0:2024cv01100
Petitioner:
Erik Becerra
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jason Bates v. United States
as 24-1643
Petitioner:
Jason D. Bates
Respondent:
United States of America
Clyde Johnson, II v. United States, et al
as 24-1644
Plaintiff:
Clyde Bernard Johnson, II
Defendant:
United States of America, Stephanie Swords, Doctor, USMCFP, Collins, Doctor, USMCFP and others
Frencher v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00112
Petitioner:
Johnnathan Monroe Frencher
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Godfrey v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv03010
Plaintiff:
Sylvan Godfrey
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Chilton v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00055
Petitioner:
Brett Michaels Chilton
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
James v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv05016
Plaintiff:
Christopher James
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Henderson v. Jeffreys
as 8:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
Tillman Henderson
Respondent:
United States of America and Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
