Cases 81 - 90 of 102
Cedrick Mhoon v. Jeremy Disotell, et al
as 14-1264
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cedrick Mhoon
Defendant - Appellee:
Jeremy Disotell, Patrolman, Conway Police Department, Brian A. Busby, Patrolman, Conway Police Department, T. G. Cooper, Patrolman, Conway Police Department and others
Mathis v USA
as 3:2013cv00089
Petitioner:
Richard Mathis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mathis
as 3:2013cv00088
Petitioner:
Richard Mathis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Theisen et al v. Stoddard County et al
as 1:2013cv00032
Plaintiff:
Matthew Theisen , Michael Theisen , Gerald Theisen and others
Defendant:
Stoddard County , Stoddard County Sheriff's Office , Stoddard County Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sean Mathis v. Jeff Norman
as 12-3362
Petitioner - Appellant:
Sean Fitzgerald Mathis
Respondent - Appellee:
Jeff Norman
Mathis v. Meinzer et al
as 5:2012cv00271
Plaintiff:
Willard Mathis
Defendant:
Curtis Meinzer, James Banks and Ray Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melton Miller v. Karen Holman, et al
as 12-1028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Melton Lee Miller
Defendant - Appellee:
Karen Holman, Chief Assistant, Delta Regional Unit Infirmary, ADC; originally sued as Holman, Roland Anderson, Dr., Pine Bluff, AR; originally sued as R Anderson and Holly C. Mathis, Dr., Delta Regional Unit, ADC
Mathis v. Mississippi County Detention Center et al
as 3:2011cv00077
Plaintiff:
Terrence Mathis
Defendant:
Mississippi County Detention Center and Luther Winfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Dormire
as 4:2011cv00678
Petitioner:
Sean Fitzgerald Mathis
Respondent:
Dave Dormire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mhoon v. Disotell et al
as 4:2011cv00253
Plaintiff:
Cedrick Mhoon
Defendant:
Jeremy Disotell, Brian A Busby, T G Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
