Cases 1 - 10 of 1,468
Howard v. Woods et al
as 4:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
Norris B Howard, Sr
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods, Jr, Jimmy Hudson, Joseph Gorman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. State of Iowa et al
as 4:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Olen James Brown
Defendant:
State of Iowa and Wapello County Police Department
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv04097
Plaintiff:
Cecil Brown
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections and Angel Bauer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 2:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Damion Brown
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Michelle Gray and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Haper et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Terrique Thompson
Defendant:
Unknown Haper, Unknown Womack, C. Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Poinsett County Jail
as 3:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Larry Alvin Brown
Defendant:
Poinsett County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Sieger et al
as 1:2024cv01033
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bernard Brown
Defendant:
Gene Sieger and John or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Brown et al
as 4:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Timothy Xavier Fields
Defendant:
S Brown, J Miller, E Hester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Brown
as 4:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Omar T. Muhammad
Defendant:
Brenden Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Gibson et al
as 4:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Deverick Scott
Defendant:
James Gibson, Shipman, Brandon Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
