Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Berry et al v. Walz et al
as 0:2024cv00962
Petitioner:
Cederic Lamont Berry and Cedric Lamont Berry
Respondent:
Tim Walz and Paul Schnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larson v. Walz et al
as 0:2023cv03076
Plaintiff:
Kevin Herman Larson
Defendant:
Tim Walz, Margaret H. Chutich and Known and Unkown Employees of Minnesota and Counties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bakambia v. Craane et al
as 0:2022cv02922
Plaintiff:
Marc Amouri Bakambia
Defendant:
Stephen Craane, Tim Walz, Luke Dehaan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larsen et al v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2021cv00568
Plaintiff:
Mark Wallace, Aaron Hayes, Shawn Fletcher and others
Defendant:
Nancy Johnston, Minnesota County's Health and Human Services, Minnesota Department of Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Schnell et al
as 0:2020cv01951
Defendant:
Paul E. Gazelka, John Robert Tunheim, Melissa Hortman and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fox v. Walz et al
as 0:2020cv01641
Respondent:
Paul Schnell and Tim Walz
Petitioner:
Thomas James Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Find Jodi. Com Inc et al
as 0:2020cv00353
Defendant:
Lorie Skjerven Gildiea, Tim Walz, Find Jodi. Com Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braun v. Walz et al
as 0:2020cv00331
Plaintiff:
Nathan Christopher Braun
Defendant:
Tim Walz, Various MCF-RC Officers, Commissioner of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braun v. Walz et al
as 0:2020cv00333
Defendant:
Chris Pawelk, Commission of Corrections, Tim Walz and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Christopher Braun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Walz et al
as 0:2019cv02612
Defendant:
Bill Pal-Freeman, Michelle Smith, Eddie Miles and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
