Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Criswell v. USA
as 4:2023cv00384
Petitioner:
Clifford Randolph Criswell, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Neal v. Arkansas Supreme Court et al
as 4:2020cv00863
Defendant:
Oswego County Family Court, Does United States 2nd Eastern District; Mayor, Chief of Police and Officers Hardy, AR; Sheriff, Chief Deputy and Jail Administrator etc. Sharp County, Randolph County Circuit Court and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew C Neal, Jr II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Emberton et al
as 4:2019cv00331
Defendant:
Ethan Ward, Thomas Mahan, Mike Schmoon and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Randolph Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph v. Holladay et al
as 4:2018cv00563
Defendant:
Doc Holladay, Briggs, Brawley and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Allen and Randal Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Lopez et al
as 4:2017cv00242
Plaintiff:
Randolph John Mathis
Defendant:
Steve Lopez, Margie Grigsby and Lonoke County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Murry et al
as 4:2017cv00021
Plaintiff:
Jesse Randolph Jones
Defendant:
Randy Murry , Tracy Sutterfield , John Willoby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Holladay et al
as 4:2015cv00168
Plaintiff:
Derrick L Allen
Defendant:
Doc Holladay, Randolph, Musaddiq and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph v. Denzer et al
as 5:2013cv05097
Plaintiff:
William D. Randolph
Defendant:
Randall Denzer, Chris Resser, Thomas Mulvaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randolph v. Hobbs
as 5:2012cv00138
Plaintiff:
Frank Randolph
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Saenz v. Washington County Detention Center
as 5:2010cv05172
Plaintiff:
Randolph Ray Saenz
Defendant:
Washington County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
