Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Mitchell v. O'Donnell et al
as 4:2023cv00152
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Mitchell and Christopher Lavelle Mitchell
Defendant:
Elizabeth O'Donnell, Amy Devine and Caleb Copley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LeClaire v. Dyer et al
as 2:2022cv02131
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael LeClaire
Defendant:
Deputy Richard Dyer and Deputy Brandon Chancey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jennings v. Schnider et al
as 4:2021cv00319
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Jennings
Defendant:
Kevin Schnider, Susan Reynolds and Polk County Commissioner
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. Schnieder
as 4:2021cv00269
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Johnson, Jr, Curtis Tharp, Jonathan McAtee and others
Defendant:
Kevin Schnieder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jennings v. USA
as 0:2021cv01035
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Jennings
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Fisher v. United States of America
as 4:2020cv00209
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Fisher
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hill v. Grant et al
as 4:2020cv00472
Defendant:
Doe, Montey Munyon, Kathy Grant and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tripp v. Cook et al
as 4:2019cv00347
Plaintiff:
Kevin Christopher Michael Tripp and Kevin Christopher Micheal Tripp
Defendant:
Larry Anderson, Kyle Bender, Tyler Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strong v. USA
as 0:2018cv01034
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Strong, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Elders v. Hicks et al
as 2:2017cv02169
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Elders
Defendant:
Adam Hicks, David Powell, S. Ryan Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
