Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Onstad v. Bethell et al
as 6:2021cv06105
Plaintiff:
Alan Cole Onstad
Defendant:
Agent Roy Bethell, Stephen L. Shirron, Judge Chris E. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Dorvey et al
as 2:2021cv02026
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Garr Clark
Defendant:
Cassie Johnson, Levi, John Doe Defendants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith-Dandridge v. Geanolous et al
as 5:2019cv05184
Defendant:
John Doe Defendants 1-20, Officer Jarrett Geanolous, Brandon Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Judy Lynn Smith-Dandridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gross v. Holloway et al
as 5:2019cv05003
Defendant:
John Doe Defendants, Deputy Meadows, Deputy Skaggs and others
Plaintiff:
Karl Duane Gross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stompingbear v. Reed
as 6:2018cv06105
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Marshall Reed, Wendy Kelley and others
Plaintiff:
Happy Stompingbear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Roberts et al
as 1:2017cv01036
Plaintiff:
Timothy David Williams
Defendant:
Ricky Roberts , Richard Mitcham , Kevin Pendleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Slay Jr. et al
as 4:2014cv01373
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Anthony Smith
Defendant:
Francis Slay, Jr. , Thomas Irwin , Bettye Battle-Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNeal v. Slay et al
as 4:2014cv01353
Plaintiff:
Shannon Renee McNeal
Defendant:
Francis G. Slay , Thomas Irwin , Bettye Battle-Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kiara Smith v. Steven Broughton, et al
as 08-1369
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kiara Smith
Defendant:
Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Wendy Kelly, Deputy Director, ADC, James Gibson, Officer Administrator, ADC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Steven Broughton, Dr. , (Originally sued as a John Doe Defendant) and Ravi Mehta, Dr. , (Originally sued as John Doe Defendant)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
