Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Glasgow v. State of Missouri et al
as 6:2024cv03092
Plaintiff:
Shannon M Glasgow
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Local Officials, Federal Officials and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damien Love v. Richard Kirkendall, et al
as 22-3149
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Damien Love
Defendant / Appellee:
Richard W. Kirkendall, Judge Michael Schubatt and Judge Thomas A. Bitter
Darden v. St. Louis Sheriffs Dept. et al
as 4:2022cv00956
Plaintiff:
Dominique Deangelo Darden
Defendant:
St. Louis Sheriffs Dept., Col. John W. Hayden, Jr., Governor Michael L. Parson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baalim v. Perkins et al
as 4:2021cv01341
Plaintiff:
Malak Baalim and Norbert K.O. Cody, II
Defendant:
Judge Lynne Perkins, Judge Katherine Fowler, Judge James E. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harden v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2021cv00307
Defendant:
Amber Rene Sabin, State of Nebraska, Amber Rene Harden and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Harden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. Kirkendall et al
as 2:2021cv01012
Petitioner:
Damien Love
Respondent:
Richard W Kirkendall and Judge Michael Schubatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hampton v. Mullen
as 4:2021cv00803
Defendant:
Judge Michael Mullen
Plaintiff:
Eugene Hampton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Houston et al
as 2:2019cv02157
Defendant:
Deputy Prosecutor Scott Houston and Circuit Judge Michael Fitzhugh
Plaintiff:
Kinyata Kimberly Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Smith v. Sydney Wallace, et al
as 16-3240
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
Sydney Wallace, James F. Kanatzar, Jeffrey Gedbaw and others
Larry Smith v. Sydney Wallace, et al
as 16-3151
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
Sydney Wallace, James F. Kanatzar, Judge Michael W. Hanna and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
