Cases 1 - 10 of 657
Xia v. King
as 0:2024cv02000
Petitioner:
Zhijun Xia
Respondent:
Mark King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lane v. King et al
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Adam Lane
Defendant:
Josephus J King, Jackson, Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randy Rindahl v. Tim Reisch, et al
as 24-2033
Plaintiff:
Randy Rindahl
Defendant:
Kimberley Malsam-Rysdon, Ex-Secretary of Health, Joan Adam, Interim Secretary of Health, Kristi Noem, Governor for the State of South Dakota and others
Barker v. Kelly et al
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Mark Barker
Defendant:
Morieon Kelly, D Mitchell, Scott Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmore v. King et al
as 4:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
Ashley King, Shrika Green, Mary Mena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Ramsey County Jail et al
as 0:2024cv01408
Plaintiff:
Arron S. King, Sr.
Defendant:
Ramsey County Jail, Willow River. CIP, Hennepin County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Millsaps v. King et al
as 4:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Travon D Higgins
Defendant:
Ashley N King, Corey Haynie, JD Wheatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Higgins v. King et al
as 4:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Travon D Higgins
Defendant:
Ashley N King, Corey Haynie, JD Wheatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Belinger et al
as 0:2024cv01303
Plaintiff:
Arron Scott King, Sr
Defendant:
Belinger, MD.O.C. and Keith Ellingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Hennipen County Jail et al
as 0:2024cv01296
Plaintiff:
Arron Scott King, Sr
Defendant:
Hennipen County Jail and Ogustine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
