Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Watson v. McMullen et al
as 4:2023cv00680
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brady Watson
Defendant:
Ty McMullen and White County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. White County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2023cv00466
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brady Watson
Defendant:
White County Sheriff's Department, RPS Inmate Roster, Ty McMullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMullen v. Bethell et al
as 6:2020cv06098
Defendant:
Cody Bethell and Sheriff Jason Watson
Plaintiff:
Olivia McMullen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McMullen v. Bowers et al
as 3:2020cv00031
Defendant:
Cambell, Edwards, Lane and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Zachary McMullen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McMullen v. Bethell et al
as 6:2018cv06126
Defendant:
Cody Bethell and Sheriff Jason Watson
Plaintiff:
Olivia McMullen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trotter v. Hill et al
as 2:2018cv04031
Plaintiff:
Carlden Trotter, Jr
Defendant:
Tyrone Hill, Kenneth Paul, Patrick McMullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Blake v. MO Dept. of Corrections, et al
as 14-3516
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenneth L. Blake
Plaintiff:
Sidney Lanier, Lloyd Davis and Sultan Lane
Defendant - Appellee:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Dwayne Kempker, Mike Kemna and others
McMullen v. Mueller et al
as 6:2014cv03208
Plaintiff:
Kenneth McMullen
Defendant:
Mueller, Caudle, Clevenger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McMullen v. Kreider et al
as 6:2014cv03207
Plaintiff:
Kenneth McMullen
Defendant:
Kreider, Rau, Ames and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kenneth Blake, et al v. Missouri Dept. of Corrections, et al
as 13-1965
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenneth L. Blake, Sidney Lanier and Sultan Lane
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Dwayne Kempker, Mike Kemna and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
