Cases 1 - 10 of 190
Keith Washington v. Minnesota DOC, et al
as 24-1962
Plaintiff:
Keith Eugene Washington, also known as Monroe Bernard Washington
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Corrections, Supervisor Officials, sued in their individual capacities, MCF Oak Park Heights, MCF Stillwater and others
Titus v. Omega Center
as 6:2024cv06056
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Double Tree Parking Garage, East End Towing, PPP Grants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Traylor v. Minnesota Dept of Corrections et al
as 0:2024cv01275
Plaintiff:
Rayco DelShaune Traylor
Defendant:
Minnesota Dept of Corrections, Binkley, Connors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. Double Tree Parking Garage et al
as 4:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Double Tree Parking Garage, East End Towing, PPP Grants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kyle Parks v. United States
as 24-1412
Petitioner:
Kyle Maurice Parks
Respondent:
United States of America
Parks v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Travis Parks
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Louis Payne v. Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-3631
Petitioner / Appellant:
Louis H. Payne
Respondent / Appellee:
Department of Corrections, Iowa Medical and Classification Center, Karla Lantz, RN and others
Kyle Parks v. United States
as 23-3588
Petitioner / Appellant:
Kyle Maurice Parks
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Parks v. Black et al
as 4:2023cv01374
Plaintiff:
Kyle M. Parks
Defendant:
Detective Matthew Black, Sgt. Adam Kavanaugh, Detective Mike Slaughter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gary Webster v. Jean Tate, et al
as 23-3203
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gary Leon Webster
Defendant / Appellee:
Jean Tate, Owner J&J Trailer Park and Emit Gaines, Management, Platinum Properties of Northeast Arkansas LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
