Cases 1 - 10 of 568
Bynum v. Woods
as 4:2024cv00688
Petitioner:
Darryl R. Bynum
Respondent:
Ryan Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wood v. Gibson
as 4:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Wood
Defendant:
James Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Justice v. Jackson et al
as 2:2024cv02034
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Dakota Justice
Defendant:
James Jackson, Gary Edward Johnson, Jimmy Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Woods and Demetrius L Woods
Defendant:
Doe, Gary Musslelwhite, Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Adrian Robert Jackson
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Myles Strid, Ronda L. Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Woods et al
as 4:2023cv00982
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar McCoy
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods, Jr, Hudson, Tompkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ames v. Ennis et al
as 5:2023cv05171
Plaintiff:
Donald Lesley Ames, Jr.
Defendant:
Parole Officer Emily Ennis, Mark Bernthal, Brenda Marshal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ames v. Sharp
as 5:2023cv05167
Plaintiff:
Donald Lesley Ames, Jr.
Defendant:
Former Officer James Sharp, Sheriff Shawn Holloway, Parole Officer Emily Ennis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ordoukhanian v. Chaney et al
as 4:2023cv01237
Plaintiff:
Raymond Dean Ordoukhanian
Defendant:
Leah Chaney, Casey Brooks, Ryan J. McCarrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Woods et al
as 4:2023cv00869
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar McCoy
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods, Jr, Hudson, Tompkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
